India must realise that resilience isn’t an economic strategy – it needs a clear economic philosophy

Every economy needs optimism. Investors respond to confidence, consumers spend when they feel secure and markets dislike panic. But optimism becomes counterproductive when it begins to substitute for introspection.

Contemporary public discourse on the Indian economy is increasingly characterised by a reassuring narrative: oil prices remain manageable, foreign exchange reserves comfortably finance imports, automobile sales indicate resilient consumption, agricultural output is stable despite climatic uncertainties, and India continues to be among the fastest-growing major economies in the world.

The depreciation of the rupee, we are told, is largely a consequence of global capital flows and a strengthening US dollar rather than domestic weakness.

None of these observations is inherently incorrect. India has indeed demonstrated remarkable macroeconomic resilience in the face of repeated global shocks. Foreign exchange reserves remain among the largest in the world, private consumption contributes more than half of GDP and growth continues to outpace most major economies.

Yet resilience is a description of an economy’s ability to absorb shocks. It is not, by itself, a development strategy. The more fundamental question is whether India possesses a coherent economic philosophy that can translate resilience into broad-based prosperity.

That question becomes particularly relevant when policymakers repeatedly describe India as a demand-driven economy. If household consumption accounts for nearly 56%-57%...

Read more