SC questions Tamil Nadu governor for withholding bills, says he ‘adopted his own procedure’
The Tamil Nadu government argued that RN Ravi, by indefinitely withholding assent to the bills, was holding the state to ransom.
Join our WhatsApp Community to receive travel deals, free stays, and special offers!
- Join Now -
Join our WhatsApp Community to receive travel deals, free stays, and special offers!
- Join Now -
The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned why Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi kept several bills pending with him for more than three years before declaring that he would withhold assent and refer some of them to the president, Live Law reported.
The governor appeared to have “adopted his own procedure” to decide on the bills, Justice JB Pardiwala of the Supreme Court remarked.
A bench comprising Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan was hearing two writ petitions filed by the Tamil Nadu government against the governor for obstructing the Legislative Assembly by withholding assent to 10 bills passed between 2020 and 2023.
“What is something so gross in the bills which the governor took three years to find?” the court asked on Thursday.
The 10 re-enacted bills, mostly related to higher education and including provisions to remove the governor as the chancellor of state universities, were sent to the president on November 18, 2023. The president approved one, rejected seven and left two unaddressed.
The court on Thursday said that the governor, by merely declaring that he would withhold assent and not returning the bills to the Assembly, would frustrate Article 200 of the Constitution, Bar and Bench reported. The constitutional provision deals with the governor’s powers to give or withhold assent to bills passed by the state legislature.
Pardiwala told...
