SC pulls up Tamil Nadu governor for referring re-passed bills to president
The court reserved its judgment on petitions filed by the state government challenging the governor’s refusal to decide on giving assent to several bills.
Join our WhatsApp Community to receive travel deals, free stays, and special offers!
- Join Now -
Join our WhatsApp Community to receive travel deals, free stays, and special offers!
- Join Now -
The Supreme Court on Monday questioned Tamil Nadu Governor RN Ravi’s decision to refer bills to the President even after the state legislature had reconsidered them and passed them a second time, Bar and Bench reported.
A bench of Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan noted that under Article 200 of the Constitution, the governor can either assent to a bill, withhold assent, or refer it to the president. However, once the governor sends the bill back to the legislature and it is passed again, it cannot be sent to the president a second time, the court emphasised.
The court reserved its judgment on petitions filed by the Tamil Nadu government challenging the governor’s refusal to decide on giving assent to several bills, including those about appointing vice chancellors to state universities.
Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi, representing Tamil Nadu, told the court that bills that had been reconsidered and passed a second time by the state legislature had been sent to the President. The court then asked Attorney General R Venkataramani, representing the Tamil Nadu governor: “How can a re-passed bill be sent to the President?”
The petitions were about 10 re-enacted bills, mostly related to higher education and including provisions to remove the governor as the chancellor of state universities. The...
